1960s

Combat! (1962)

Byte-Sized Overview

Combat! is a World War II infantry drama set in occupied France after D-Day, following the men of the King Company 2nd Platoon as they move through ruined villages, hedgerows and every other miserable stretch of countryside the war can throw at them. The series centres on the steady, tense partnership between Sgt. Chip Saunders and Lt. Gil Hanley, with the rest of the platoon rotating through danger, exhaustion and the occasional sliver of gallows humour. It is not a glossy hero machine, and that is precisely the point. If you want a war show that cares more about immediate survival, small-unit friction and the cost of each advance than about flags fluttering in the breeze, this one still earns its keep.

Transmission Details

  • Show Title: Combat!
  • Years: 1962-1967
  • Created By: Robert Pirosh
  • Network: ABC
  • Seasons: 5
  • Episodes: 152
  • Starring: Vic Morrow, Rick Jason, Pierre Jalbert, Jack Hogan, Dick Peabody
  • Supporting Cast: Conlon Carter, Steve Rogers, Shecky Greene, Tom Lowell, William Bryant
  • Genres: War drama, action, drama
  • Status: Ended

Signal Strength

Combat! works best when it remembers that infantry warfare is mostly fear, mud and awkward logistics, with the rare burst of violence arriving like a rude interruption. The writing is strongest in episodes that pin the men down emotionally as well as physically. Even when the plots are built from familiar wartime ingredients, the series usually finds a sturdy angle by making the platoon’s mission feel specific and expensive. It understands that a good patrol story is not really about winning, but about staying functional long enough to complete the next miserable task.

Vic Morrow gives the show much of its gravity as Saunders. He is tough without becoming a statue, and he can turn a plain tactical exchange into something freighted with fatigue and irritation. Rick Jason’s Hanley is a useful counterweight, more polished and officer-like, but not a figure of pure authority. The chemistry between them helps sell the series’ central tension: command is a job, not a personality type. Around them, the ensemble gives the platoon shape, especially when episodes let individual men carry the emotional burden instead of treating them as interchangeable helmets.

Where the show sometimes loses momentum is in repetition. Any long-running combat series has to recycle patrols, ambushes, scouting missions and village evacuations, and Combat! occasionally leans too hard on the format. A few stories are more procedural than dramatic, and some guest characters are sketched quickly enough to fade once the shooting starts. But the production values usually keep the thing moving. The black-and-white photography, location work and disciplined staging give it a rough-edged immediacy that still feels purposeful rather than quaint.

Vibe Check

This is a serious, relentless war series with just enough wit to stop it from collapsing under its own helmet. The pace is brisk in a 1960s network-drama way, but not flippant. Episodes tend to be tense rather than sprawling, and the emotional tone is wary, unsentimental and occasionally bleak. There are stretches of quiet reconnaissance and argument before the shooting starts, so it is not wall-to-wall action, despite the title doing its best to promise otherwise.

Viewers who like character-led military drama, cleanly staged field action and the slightly bruised optimism of men trying to finish a job in impossible circumstances will probably get a lot out of it. If you prefer modern war drama’s greater psychological density or more obvious visual realism, this may feel old-fashioned in places. Then again, old-fashioned is not always a flaw. Sometimes it just means the series knows how to build a scene, light a ridge line and then ruin everyone’s afternoon.

Spoiler Mode

Combat! is fundamentally a series about endurance, not transformation. The central platoon begins the run as a hard-bitten unit moving through liberated France and keeps facing the same brutal arithmetic: take the ground, count the wounded, bury the dead, move on. Saunders and Hanley remain the key stabilisers throughout, but the changing roster around them gives the show its long-term shape. Men arrive, prove themselves, vanish, recover, die or are transferred away, which keeps the series from settling into cosy familiarity even when the format itself is recognisable.

One of the most important recurring patterns is how the platoon’s professional instincts are tested by civilians, prisoners, resistance fighters and higher command. Episodes frequently place Saunders in situations where a tactical choice collides with a moral one. He is usually the man who has to decide whether to conserve his squad, trust a stranger, or risk everything to pull someone else through. Hanley often acts as the more formal officer presence, but the series refuses to make him a distant bureaucrat. The best stories force both men to confront the same fact from different angles: orders do not make war less personal.

The series also leans heavily on rotation within the squad, and that has narrative consequences. Caje, Kirby, Littlejohn and the others are not decorative sidekicks but the living memory of the platoon. When one of them is injured, isolated or forced into an episode-specific crisis, the loss changes the unit’s rhythm. The show repeatedly uses that structure to show how war hollows out the luxury of certainty. Even when a mission succeeds, it often succeeds at the cost of some trust, some innocence or some practical piece of the men’s working life.

By the later seasons, the series has settled into a more assured, less experimental groove, but it still mines the war’s uncertainty rather than turning into a victory parade. The most recent stretch leaves the central story in the same essential place it began: the platoon remains in motion, survival remains provisional, and any sense of progress is measured in seconds and kilometres rather than grand speeches. That refusal to wrap the war in a neat emotional bow is part of the show’s lasting appeal. It understands that the real ending, for men like these, is not triumph but the next dawn.

Character Shout-Outs

Chip Saunders, played by Vic Morrow: Saunders is the show’s rough centre of gravity, a sergeant who feels every decision before he makes it and lets very little of that show. Morrow gives him the right mix of authority, impatience and exhaustion, so Saunders never plays as a generic action lead. He is a working soldier, not a myth. That grounded performance is one of the series’ biggest strengths, because it keeps the drama focused on competence under pressure rather than on broad heroics.

Lt. Gil Hanley, played by Rick Jason: Hanley gives the platoon its officer’s-eye view without turning into a boardroom in boots. Jason makes him measured, intelligent and occasionally vulnerable, which helps the Saunders-Hanley dynamic feel like a real command partnership instead of a weekly argument about rank. He is especially effective in scenes where authority has to be persuasive rather than merely announced.

Caje, played by Pierre Jalbert: Caje adds alertness and warmth to a unit that could otherwise become all grit and no texture. Jalbert brings a quiet confidence that makes the character feel observant rather than ornamental. He often functions as one of the series’ most useful emotional connectors, because he can register fear, loyalty and suspicion in very small beats.

Kirby, played by Jack Hogan: Kirby is one of the platoon’s most practical presences, and Hogan plays him with a watchful, no-nonsense energy. He helps ground the group’s banter and battlefield routines, and he is especially good when the show needs a character who can absorb danger without turning into a saint. He feels like a man who has learned the job the hard way.

Littlejohn, played by Dick Peabody: Littlejohn brings a different physical and emotional texture to the squad, often reinforcing the sense that the platoon is a collection of mismatched men held together by necessity. Peabody makes him sturdy without flattening him into a punchline or a lumbering stereotype. The role benefits from that restraint, and so does the ensemble.

Doc Walton, played by Steve Rogers and Conlon Carter: The squad medic is one of the most useful supporting roles in the series because he keeps reminding everyone that the war’s consequences do not end when the firing stops. Both performers help the character function as conscience, technician and witness, which is no small assignment in a show this busy.

Braddock, played by Shecky Greene: Braddock provides a sharper comic edge, but the character is not just there to crack wise between explosions. Greene gives him a nervous, slightly abrasive presence that makes him memorable in a cast full of strong personalities. He helps stop the series from becoming too solemn, which is a valuable service in a drama where solemnity comes standard.

Deep Dive Highlights

Combat! was developed by Robert Pirosh and launched by ABC in 1962 as a black-and-white wartime drama that would later shift into colour for its final season. That transition matters less as trivia than as evidence of a series adapting to television’s changing look while keeping its core identity intact. The show is remembered as one of the longest-running American World War II dramas, and that longevity came from a very specific creative gamble: it focused on the frontline infantryman rather than the usual parade of generals, brass and home-front speeches.

The production also has a strong behind-the-scenes pedigree. Early preparation included military training for the principal cast, which is exactly the sort of detail that explains why the performances often feel physically embedded in the work of soldiering. The series used MGM resources and backlot work alongside exterior filming, giving it a practical, grounded appearance that helped sell the illusion of movement across wartime France. That mix of studio control and outdoor grime is one reason the show still looks more purposeful than polished.

Another noteworthy feature is the rotating creative input. The series had a clear house style, but individual directors and writers could alter its mood quite sharply. That variation is one reason long-time viewers still discuss specific episodes rather than just the show as a whole. Some instalments are tightly tactical, others are more reflective, and a few lean into moral ambiguity in ways that were unusually pointed for network television of the period. The result is a series that can feel both serial and anthology-like, depending on the week.

Legacy & Impact

Combat! holds an important place in television history because it helped define the small-unit war drama on American network TV. It lasted five seasons and 152 episodes, which is no small achievement for a genre that does not always promise easy comfort viewing. Its reputation has also been reinforced by later critical attention, retrospectives and episode rankings that continue to single out individual instalments as standouts. The series is often cited as a benchmark for the more intimate, ground-level approach to battlefield storytelling.

Its influence can be felt in later war dramas that centre on squad dynamics rather than grand strategy. The emphasis on camaraderie, attrition and tactical survival helped establish a template that many later shows would revisit in more modern language. It also demonstrated that a war series could be both action-driven and character-led without turning into a recruitment poster. That is a useful legacy, even if the show occasionally wears the earnestness of its era like a very tidy uniform.

Skull Face’s Take

Combat! is worth watching if you want a serious, character-driven war series that treats infantry life as a grind rather than a victory lap. The strong lead performances, convincing unit dynamics and often impressive tension make it easy to recommend to classic-TV fans and anyone curious about television’s earlier attempts at realistic combat drama. What may put you off is the era’s episodic repetition and the occasional stiffness of 1960s network storytelling, but the show’s best episodes still hit hard.

The final transmission

Skull Face's Score

8.2/10
A strong recommendation

Skull Face's independent editorial rating

A durable, intelligent war series with strong performances and a clear sense of purpose.

What works

  • Vic Morrow and Rick Jason anchor the platoon convincingly
  • The frontline perspective gives the show real grit
  • Location work and staging create genuine tension

What may not

  • Some stories repeat the same patrol template
  • A few supporting characters are underwritten
  • The 1960s network format can feel rigid
Back to top button